РАЗРАБОТКА РАСЧЕТНО-АНАЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ МЕТОДИКИ ОЦЕНКИ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ САМОЗАЛЕЧИВАЮЩЕГОСЯ БЕТОНА И КРИСТАЛЛИЧЕСКОЙ ГИДРОИЗОЛЯЦИИ В ФУНДАМЕНТНЫХ КОНСТРУКЦИЯХ
Comparison of concrete self-healing and waterproofing mechanisms
compiled by the authors on the basis of [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and also [6], [7], [8], [23]
Approach | Mechanism of action | Advantages | Limitations |
Autogenous healing | Continued hydration, carbonation and deposition of products in the crack | Low cost, natural mechanism | Limited crack width, dependence on moisture |
Crystalline admixtures | Formation of insoluble crystalline products in capillaries and cracks | Constructability, applicability in monolithic concrete | Correct dosage and mix control are required |
Microcapsules | Capsule rupture during crack opening and release of a healing agent | High local activity | Cost, possible influence on concrete structure |
Biomineralization | CaCO3 precipitation as a result of microbiological processes | Promising for sustainable construction | Limited practical applicability and environmental requirements |
Integrated system | Combination of admixtures, external protection, waterstops, drainage and monitoring | Higher reliability due to multiple barriers | Higher initial cost |
