A social approach to assessing the impact of urbanization on natural resources: A case study of Makurdi-Benue State, Nigeria

Data paper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2025.156.82
Issue: № 6 (156), 2025
Suggested:
10.01.2025
Accepted:
04.06.2025
Published:
17.06.2025
154
2
XML
PDF

Abstract

The environment is under more stress due to urbanization in Makurdi Metropolis, which raises questions regarding sustainable growth. Based on a survey of 185 locals, this study investigates how environmental deterioration and population increase are influenced by factors like high birth rates and rural-to-urban migration. The research indicates that the suggested remedies and the perceived problems associated with urbanization are highly aligned. Although rural development and tree planting are viewed as successful strategies, the community makes it apparent that better urban planning and enforcement are required. The results highlight how crucial it is to improve urban planning procedures, boost community involvement, and put workable solutions into place in order to mitigate the adverse effects of urbanization. In conclusion, Makurdi's urbanization is linked to serious environmental and social problems, such as pollution, habitat degradation, and biodiversity loss. Particularly, 84.6% of respondents are worried about rising pollution, and 80% of respondents consider high population density to be a big problem. Two other significant difficulties mentioned by 82% and 87% of respondents, respectively, are habitat loss and deforestation. The method used for this research involves a mixed-methods approach, using both quantitative and qualitative data to examine the relationships between urbanization, socio-economic factors, and natural resource depletion. The analysis is underscored by urbanization and sustainability theories and intends to identify the impacts of urbanization, understand socio-economic influences, and provide recommendations for sustainable development. The expected outcomes include quantification of urbanization impacts, analysis of socio-economic influences, and policy recommendations for mitigating negative impacts and promoting sustainable development.

1. Introduction

The environment is under more stress due to urbanization in Nigeria's Makurdi Metropolis, which raises questions regarding sustainable growth

. The world is increasingly becoming more urbanized, which damages plant biodiversity and alters plant habitat 
. Population shift from urban areas to suburban fringes, decline in food supply, destruction of biodiversity, destruction or loss of environmentally sensitive areas. In urban settlement and management, biodiversity conservation is essential, and it is also a crucial aspect of greening. Problems like a lack of plant species and urban green space have become obstacles to the establishment of biologically appealing zones. But people are seeking ways to balance modernization and the environment, as well as ways to balance biodiversity with economic growth
The rapid urbanization in Benue State, Nigeria, has precipitated profound transformations in land use and land cover patterns, characterized by the widespread conversion of natural habitats into urban areas, agricultural land, and other human-dominated landscapes. Urban growth has led to so many environmental problems,such as, pollution, deforestation, and loss of natural habitats
. This phenomenon has far-reaching consequences, including the loss of fertile farmland, decreased agricultural productivity, and compromised food security, as the most productive agricultural land is diverted to accommodate urban development
furthermore, the burgeoning urban population in Benue State has led to an escalation in social and economic activities, placing immense pressure on existing infrastructure and services. The impact of urbanization on biodiversity in African cities presents unique challenges and opportunities
. Noted that awareness of the benefits of urban green spaces is low among stakeholders in sub-Saharan Africa. population shift from urban areas to suburban fringes, decline in food supply, destruction of biodiversity, destruction or loss of environmentally sensitive areas.Notably, the criteria used to define an urban Centre vary significantly across countries, encompassing factors such as population size, density, and economic activities. Moreover,
provide a review of urbanization in tropical regions and its relationship with deforestation. The study notes that as urban areas grow, they encroach on forests that once served as biodiversity hotspots, reducing the number of plant species and ecosystem resilience. In emerging nations like Nigeria, where urbanization puts strain on ecosystems and changes social, economic, and environmental dynamics, this trend is especially noticeable. In addition to rearranging economies and locations, urbanization increases the demand on natural resources, causing previously unheard-of environmental stress. These adverse environmental impacts are best illustrated by Makurdi Metropolis in Benue State, where growing urban populations put a great deal of strain on the environment and disturb regional ecosystems. Urbanization play major roles in the loss of the world’s biodiversity and the homogenization of its biota. Nevertheless, comparatives studies of urban biodiversity leading to robust generalities of the status and drivers of biodiversity in cities at the global scale are not enough
. The issues with biodiversity fragmentation in Makurdi metropolis are not influenced by anthropogenic activities alone. Factors such as natural disasters from flooding contributed to the continual habitat alteration, most especially in the aquatic body. By evaluating the environmental implications of urban growth and suggesting ways for reducing the negative effects on Benue State's natural ecosystem, this study aims to investigate these dynamics inside Makurdi. This study offers a thorough understanding of the effects of urbanization on Makurdi's environmental health by combining survey data with previously published works, emphasizing the consequences for sustainable development and policy.

2. Scientific novelty of the research

The dynamics within the city of Makurdi are examined in this study. By combining survey data with previously released research, it also provides a comprehensive understanding of the effects of urbanization on Makurdi's environmental health, highlighting the implications for sustainable development and policy while evaluating the ecological implications of urban growth and offering solutions to lessen the detrimental effects on natural ecosystems.

The goal: to assess the social impacts of urbanization on natural resources in Makurdi and identify strategies for sustainable development.

3. The objectives

To conduct a thorough assessment of the current environmental situation in Makurdi, focusing on natural resource degradation and urbanization impacts, and identify the social factors influencing the relationship between urbanization and natural resource degradation, while examining existing policies and practices related to urban planning and natural resource management, developing and proposing strategies for promoting sustainable urban development and environmental conservation, and engaging with local stakeholders to raise awareness and build support for sustainable urban development and environmental conservation in Makurdi.

Relevance: this study is pertinent due to its investigation of the nexus between urbanization and natural resource degradation in Makurdi, providing valuable insights for sustainable urban planning, environmental management, and policy development.

4. Research methodology

4.1. Description of The Study Area

The Makurdi Local Government Area lies between lat.70 00l N and 70 45l N and long 80 00l and 80 32l E in the northeastern part of Benue State. It is situated within a physiographic zone called the Benue trough with a mean elevation of 92 meters above sea level. Makurdi shared boundary with Gwer West Local Government Area to the west, Gwer East Local Government Area to the south, Guma to the North East and Doma to the North West. Politically, it falls within the Middle Belt region of Nigeria and has a radius of 16 kilometres from its centre. It is the capital of Benue State and headquarters of Makurdi Local Government Area. It serves as a major link between the Northern and Southern parts of Nigeria. The town has several drainage channels. These channels include river Benue, which bisects the town into South and north banks, and its tributaries including Urudu, Demepe, Kereke and Mu and the smaller ones include Idye and Kpege 

.

Map of Makurdi showing wards and vegetation 2017

Figure 1 - Map of Makurdi showing wards and vegetation 2017

Note: based on [9]

Map of makurdi showing wards and vegetation 2023

Figure 2 - Map of makurdi showing wards and vegetation 2023

Note: based on [9]

Table 1 - Percentage of land cover showing by year

Land Cover Type

2017 (sq.km)

2023 (sq.km)

2017 (%)

2023 (%)

Water

24.84

27.33

3.00

3.28

Trees

26.41

14.47

3.19

1.74

Flooded Vegetation

0.00

2.70

0.00

0.32

Crops

33.72

42.15

4.07

5.06

Built up

81.50

146.72

9.83

17.60

Bare ground

9.75

7.32

1.18

0.88

Rangelands

652.48

593.02

78.73

71.13

Note: Data is obtained from Sentinel-2 10m Land Use/Land Cover Time series : source, [9]

4.2. Study Design

The research employed a quantitative methodology, using structured surveys to gather data from 185 respondents in Makurdi. Stratified sampling ensured proportional representation across demographic variables such as gender, age, and occupation. Data collection focused on assessing demographic characteristics, urbanization drivers, environmental issues, and public opinions on sustainable urban management. Findings were tabulated to illustrate trends and population sentiments regarding urbanization's environmental impact. A descriptive design was selected to understand the extent of urbanization’s impact within the area. Python R was used to analyze the data for an effective and clear presentation of the information gathered. The design made it easier to record demographic information and investigate the connections between environmental effects and urban growth drivers. As shown in frequency and percentage statistics, the study examined the reasons behind urbanization, environmental issues associated with urbanization, and public perception of possible remedies. These tables were crucial for understanding how urbanization affected the environment. Alternative approaches to assessing urbanization's impact on natural resources include physical/environmental methods like remote sensing, ecological footprint analysis, and life cycle assessment; economic approaches such as cost-benefit analysis, economic valuation, and green accounting; integrated approaches like sustainability assessment, urban metabolism analysis, and resilience-based approaches; and participatory and collaborative methods involving stakeholder engagement, participatory rural appraisal, and collaborative governance.

5. Results

Table 2 - Demographic Data

Demographic Data

Distribution of Gender

Sex of Respondent

Frequency

Percentage %

Male

105

56.8

Female

80

43.2

Total

185

100

Age of the Respondents

Age of Respondents

Frequency

Percentage %

18-24

46

24.9

25-31

58

31.4

32-38

24

12.9

39-45

32

17.3

46 above

25

13.5

Total

185

100

Education Level of the Respondent

Education Level of the Respondents

Frequency

Percentage %

Non-formal education

10

5.4

Primary

1

0.5

Secondary

49

26.5

Tertiary

100

54.1

Postgraduate

25

13.5

Total

185

100

Occupation of Respondents

Occupation of Respondents

Frequency

Percentage %

Farming

46

24.7

Nursery Manager

4

2.2

Fishing

2

1.2

Trading

59

31.9

Civil Servant

49

26.5

Others

25

13.5

Total

185

100

Marital Status of Respondents

Marital Status of Respondent

Frequency

Percentage %

Widowed

17

9.2

Divorced

7

3.8

Single

85

45.9

Married

76

41.1

Total

185

100

Note: Field Survey, 2024

Table 3 - Causes of Urbanization with Makurdi

Causes of Urbanization with Makurdi

Increase in Birthrate

Birthrate Increase

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

2

1.1

Disagree

15

8

Agree

68

36.8

Strongly Agree

100

54.1

Total

185

100

Rural Urban Migration

Rural Urban Migration

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

7

3.7

Disagree

19

10.3

Agree

73

39.5

Strongly Agree

86

46.5

Total

185

100

Employment Opportunities and Higher wage

Employment Opportunities & Higher wage

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

13

7.0

Disagree

35

18.8

Agree

76

41.3

Strongly Agree

61

32.9

Total

185

100

Migration due to Conflict and Environmental Disaster

Migration due to Conflict & Environmental Disaster

Frequency

Percentage%

Strongly Disagree

12.7

6.9

Disagree

26.0

14.1

Agree

60.0

32.3

Strongly Agree

86.3

46.7

Total

185

100

Availability of Social Amenities

Availability of Social Amenities

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

11

5.9

Disagree

25

13.5

Agree

89

48.1

Strongly Agree

60

32.4

Total

185

100

Note: Field Survey, 2024

Table 4 - Problems of Urbanization within Makurdi

Problems of Urbanization within Makurdi

High Population

High Population

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

5

2.7

Disagree

9

4.9

Agree

100

54.1

Strongly Agree

71

38.1

Total

185

100

Pollution

Pollution

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

19

10.3

Disagree

24

13

Agree

91

49.1

Strongly Agree

51

27.6

Total

185

100

Deforestation

Deforestation

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

1

0.5

Disagree

26

14.1

Agree

75

40.5

Strongly Agree

83

44.9

Total

185

100

Climate Change

Climate Change

Frequency

Percentage%

Strongly Disagree

0

0

Disagree

29

15.7

Agree

105

56.7

Strongly Agree

51

27.6

Total

185

100

Habitat Loss

Habitat Loss

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

5

2.1

Disagree

30

16.2

Agree

105

56.7

Strongly Agree

45

25

Total

185

100

Soil Erosion

Soil Erosion

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

2

1.1

Disagree

25

13.5

Agree

97

52.4

Strongly Agree

61

33

Total

185

100

Lack of Law Enforcement

Lack of Law Enforcement

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

2

1.1

Disagree

17

9.2

Agree

72

38.9

Strongly Agree

94

50.8

Total

185

100

Note: Field Survey, 2024

Table 5 - Impacts of Urbanization within Makurdi

Over-Exploitation of Resources

Over-Exploitation of Resources

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Agree

3

1.6

Agree

23

12.4

Disagree

81

43.8

Strongly Disagree

78

42.2

Total

185

100

Infrastructural Development of Cities withUrban Plan

Development of Cities without Urban Planning

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

5

2.7

Disagree

26

14.1

Agree

96

51.9

Strongly Agree

58

31.3

Total

185

100

Indiscriminate Waste Disposal

Strongly Disagree

1

0.5

Disagree

20

10.8

Agree

91

49.2

Strongly Agree

73

39.5

Total

185

100

Extinction of Species

Extinction of Species

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

6

3.2

Disagree

34

18.4

Agree

87

47

Strongly Agree

58

31.4

Total

185

100

Degradation of Habitat

Degradation of Habitat

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

2

1.1

Disagree

27

14.6

Agree

97

52.4

Strongly Agree

59

31.9

Total

185

100

Changes in Species Distribution

Changes in Species Distribution

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

3

1.6

Disagree

44

23.8

Agree

91

49.2

Strongly Agree

47

25.4

Total

185

100

Introduction of Invasive Species

Introduction of Invasive Species

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

7

3.7

Disagree

29

15.7

Agree

81

43.8

Strongly Agree

68

36.8

Total

185

100

Note: Field Survey, 2024

Table 6 - Solution to Problem of Urbanization within Makurdi

Solution to Problem of Urbanization within Makurdi

Tree Planting

Tree Planting

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

0

0

Disagree

25

13.5

Agree

60

32.4

Strongly Agree

100

54.1

Total

185

100

Development of Rural Area

Development of Rural Area

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

5

2.7

Disagree

22

11.9

Agreed

60

32.4

Strongly Agree

98

53

Total

185

100

Proper Disposal of Waste

Proper Disposal of Waste

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

2

1.1

Disagree

19

10.3

Agree

70

37.8

Strongly Agree

94

50.8

Total

185

100

Proper Urban Planning

Proper Urban Planning

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

69

37.3

Disagree

16

8.7

Agree

87

47.0

Strongly Agree

13

7.0

Total

185

100

Green Infrastructure

Green Infrastructure

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

8

4.2

Disagree

14

7.7

Agree

77

41.6

Strongly Agree

86

46.5

Total

185

100

Renewable Energy Integration

Renewable Energy Integration

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

1

0.5

Disagree

18

9.7

Agree

100

54.1

Strongly Agree

66

35.7

Total

185

100

Climate Resilient Design

Climate Resilient Design

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

3

1.6

Disagree

17

9.2

Agree

105

56.8

Strongly Agree

60

32.4

Total

185

100

Community Engagement

Community Engagement

Frequency

Percentage %

Strongly Disagree

2

1.1

Disagree

17

9.2

Agree

89

48.1

Strongly Agree

77

41.6

Total

185

100

Note: Field Survey, 2024

6. Discussion

6.1. Cross-tabulation of Data

Cross-tabulating demographic factors with perceptions of urbanization impacts is essential for understanding how different segments of the population view and are affected by urban growth. This analysis offers valuable insights into the variability of perceptions based on age, gender, and occupation, which can aid in designing targeted interventions and policies. First, it is crucial to structure the data to include both demographic details — such as age, gender, and occupation — as shown in Table 2 and responses to questions about urbanization. By analyzing how these demographic factors influence perceptions of urbanization's impacts, we can uncover patterns that reveal how different groups experience urban growth.

For instance, examining perceptions across various age groups can highlight whether younger or older respondents perceive urbanization differently. Table 2 Age of the Respondents illustrates these differences, showing how younger respondents might report higher levels of agreement with concerns about urbanization’s impacts, such as increased pollution or habitat loss. This suggests that younger individuals may be more affected by or more aware of these issues compared to older groups. Gender-based analysis can uncover if there are notable differences in how males and females perceive the effects of urbanization. If, for example, female respondents express greater concerns about pollution, this could indicate a need for gender-specific environmental policies that address these unique concerns. Understanding these gender-specific perceptions can help tailor more effective and inclusive policies. Occupation-based perceptions further reveal how different professional groups view urbanization's impacts. Individuals in "Trading" might experience and report economic impacts differently than those in "Civil Service". This differentiation highlights the need for targeted interventions that address the specific needs of various occupational groups, such as improving trade-related infrastructure or enhancing public services for civil employees. Overall, cross-tabulating demographic factors with perceptions of urbanization impacts provides a nuanced understanding of how urban growth affects different groups. Table 2 Age of the Respondents alongside the statistical analysis, presents a comprehensive view of these varying perceptions, which can guide more effective and inclusive urban planning and policy-making. This approach helps identify specific concerns of diverse demographic segments and informs targeted strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of urbanization.

6.2. Correlation of Data

To explore the correlations between perceived causes of urbanization and its effects on biodiversity, it is essential to analyze how different urbanization drivers are related to changes in biodiversity as show in (figure 3) below. This involves examining survey data that includes responses on both perceived causes of urbanization and observed effects on biodiversity. The data should be organized so that each respondent's perceptions and observations are captured in separate columns, with responses rated on a Likert scale or numerical scale. The analysis begins with calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient between perceived causes of urbanization and their effects on biodiversity. This coefficient, which ranges from -1 to 1, helps quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between these variables. A correlation of 1 indicates a perfect positive relationship, -1 signifies a perfect negative relationship, and 0 indicates no correlation. For instance, if there is a high positive correlation, such as 0.8, between the perception of natural increase as a driver of urbanization and its effect on biodiversity, it implies that respondents who view natural increase as a major factor also perceive it as significantly impacting biodiversity. Such a correlation suggests that these respondents believe the natural increase in population is closely linked to adverse effects on biodiversity.

Correlation Matrix showing the respondents views

Figure 3 - Correlation Matrix showing the respondents views

6.3. Overall Analysis of Urbanization in Makurdi Metropolis

The analysis of urbanization in Makurdi, based on responses from data collected, offers a comprehensive view of the causes, problems, and effects of urban growth in the area. The data reveals significant insights into how urbanization impacts the environment and community, and highlights potential solutions. Natural increase and rural-urban migration are identified as the primary drivers of urbanization, with 92% and 92.7% of respondents, respectively, recognizing these factors as significant contributors to urban expansion. Additionally, 68% attribute urban growth to employment opportunities, 71.3% to migration due to conflict and environmental disasters, and 79.3% to the availability of social amenities. This consensus underscores the multifaceted nature of urban growth in Makurdi, driven by both demographic factors and the pursuit of better living conditions. A significant 80% of respondents view high population density as a major issue, while 84.6% are concerned about increased pollution. Deforestation and habitat loss are also prominent issues, with 82% and 87% of respondents, respectively, citing these as major problems. This agreed with 

that, “deforestation is the most relevant and complex challenge in the debate on reconciling conservation and regional development”. Climate change and soil erosion are similarly viewed as adverse effects of urban growth, affecting 81% and 73% of respondents. Furthermore, inadequate law enforcement (74%) exacerbates these issues by failing to regulate urban expansion effectively. The effects of urbanization on biodiversity and other factors are equally concerning. Respondents perceive increased disease outbreaks (79.4%), overexploitation of resources (79.3%), and improper waste disposal (74%) as significant consequences. Extinction of species (80%) and habitat degradation (87.4%) are particularly alarming, with 81% noting changes in species distribution and 71% observing the introduction of invasive species.

In terms of solutions, tree planting is widely supported, with 80% of respondents strongly agreeing on its effectiveness. Rural area development (78%), proper waste disposal (79%), and green infrastructure (61%) also receive strong backing. However, there is notable dissatisfaction with current urban planning, with only 3% of respondents strongly agreeing on its effectiveness, indicating a significant gap in urban management strategies. Renewable energy integration (56%) and climate-resilient design (50%) are also endorsed, although community engagement (44.7%) is less emphasized. The data suggests a strong alignment between the perceived problems of urbanization and the proposed solutions. While tree planting and rural development are seen as effective measures, the community expresses a clear need for improved urban planning and enforcement. The findings underscore the importance of enhancing urban planning processes, increasing community engagement, and implementing practical solutions to address the negative impacts of urbanization. In summary, urbanization in Makurdi is associated with significant environmental and social challenges, including biodiversity loss, pollution, and habitat degradation. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach involving better urban planning, effective policy enforcement, and active community involvement to mitigate the adverse effects and promote sustainable urban development.

Correlation Matrix of Urbanization Causes Effects on Biodiversity

Figure 4 - Correlation Matrix of Urbanization Causes Effects on Biodiversity

7. Conclusion

Urbanization in Makurdi has led to several pressing environmental issues, from resource overuse to pollution and habitat degradation. The city’s population growth, spurred by both natural increase and rural migration, is stretching Makurdi’s ecosystem to its limits. The data from this study reveal that pollution, deforestation, and soil erosion are significant concerns for residents, driven largely by unregulated urban expansion. Reforestation, improved waste management, climate resilience design, community involvement, and alternative energy solutions are all strongly favored by the community in spite of these obstacles. Together with thorough urban planning, these tactics can help Makurdi achieve sustainable growth that benefits the city's people and the environment. This strategy calls for legislative action that protects community ecosystems while attending to the particular requirements of urban centers, serving as a model for other expanding cities in comparable environmental circumstances.

Article metrics

Views:154
Downloads:2
Views
Total:
Views:154